There is nothing I hate more than a female journalist blathering on about modern day mating rituals and the numerous ways to get the cuirassier of your dreams. It is precisely for this reason that I have turned my attention to Lucy Mangan who’se Guide To Being A Girl begins with the following cunterratum: ‘...from the age of about eight onwards (later if you are posh and have ponies to obsess about and so can sublimate your sexual urges by competing in gymkhanas), the race is on to get a boyfriend.’ It is perhaps inconceivable to a woman like Mangan, with her pre-school house-frau aspirations, that while her prepubescence was spent building a reputation as the classroom slut the rest of us were trying to get to grips with math equations. But never mind that. It’s not her early forays in to tactical-man-trapping that turns me a darker shade of salmon. No. It’s her consummately moronic manual-guide that incites a certain urge to perforate any one of her organs with the sharp-end of a bradawl. Mangan’s wishy-washy ideas on dating and mating – with the same depth of judgment as those of a streetwalker – manifest themselves in monotonous stereotypical eructations about grooming, screwing and the like. I have little inclination to discuss her cuntcoctions at length or try to understand the mind-crippling nonsensical observations such as: ‘Dating may be the reason we (women) don't rule the world. Nothing saps a girl's will or zest for life like it’ or ‘Post-25, your relationships are defined by unrelieved anxiety about the present - could he be The One? Could I make him into The One?’ or better yet, the ways to prepare for a date:’Stop eating and take eight days off work to start exfoliating...Have cosmetic surgery to get rid of unsightly blemishes and noses...Apply make-up with all the proper brushes, puffs, sponges and curlers.’ and so on until eventually Miss Mangan writes herself completely out of relevance.
I do however wonder how this sort of spumous mullock gets in to print and more importantly who buys it. But perhaps I will never know…unless…I join some sort social club for prospective bunny-boilers with self-esteem issues, an inordinate penchant for vodka and Gloria Gaynor’s greatest hits. Then again, I think I’d rather not know. I think I’d rather just pronounce Miss Mangan and her ilk as certified cunts and be done with it.
-
- 2007-08-20 @ 14:54:09
-
- 2007-08-21 @ 11:09:50
"Spumous mullock" - fantastic!!! If they aren't already words then they bloody well should be :-)
BTW - I can't get rid of that bunny cartoon to the right of your text and which is obscuring some of your writing.-
- http://
- 2007-08-21 @ 15:04:38
Unfortunately, I can't take credit for either ‘spumous’ or ‘mullock’ as they are already in the English dictionary, but I did put them together in one sentence if that counts for anything.
-
- 2007-08-21 @ 12:39:02
SPINSTER ALERT!!!!!
-
- http://
- 2007-08-21 @ 15:06:41
Dear LostBoy,
It is not entirely clear to me whether your comment is a botched attempt at humour or insolence. A clarification would be greatly appreciated, but perhaps that is too much to ask from a person such as yourself who’se thinking is clearly determined by the colour of his hair thus I would prefer it if you did as your cuntonym says and got lost.-
- 2007-08-21 @ 15:36:48
Dear Madam,
I always try to combine as many botchings as possible in a single comment, thus saving time and energy.
A witticism about your own 'cuntonym' would have been desirable at this point, but its complexity has confounded me.
Good day.-
- http://
- 2007-08-21 @ 18:54:34
Confounded you?
Oh I see, another one of your botchings. No, no, Sir sarcasm isn’t one of your strong points, either. Perhaps you could try your hand at keeping quiet?-
- 2007-08-22 @ 10:37:36
I now see that you require a dose of domestic subjugation to improve your manners. Perhaps a visit from Madam Modesty wouldn't go amiss either.
-
- http://
- 2007-08-22 @ 23:16:56
And I now see that the only way to improve yours, Sir, is by means of chemical castration. I strongly urge you to consider it.
Additionally, I am not familiar with a ‘Madam’ called ‘Modesty’ or any other madam for that matter but I expect you are a common visitor of madams some of whom may even go by the name of Modesty while in fact being anything but. That said, I do so hope you will give castration some thought.
-
- 2007-08-23 @ 16:17:05
I find your fascination with my insatiable sexual appetite quite disturbing, and it is now clear that my initial comment was not only keenly observed but indeed completely true. No doubt you and your closest friend Tiddles the Cat were in a fit of giggles as you suggested I effectively remove my testicles for your benefit.
-
- http://
- 2007-08-24 @ 12:06:06
How ill informed you are, Sir! Tiddles is not a cat at all but a very friendly Pinscher who is more than willing to do the testicle removing should you so wish.
As for your sexual appetites; they are of little interest to me. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for your fixation with my marital status. Your inordinate preoccupation with the topic is wholly disconcerting and perhaps a little indicative of your true motives behind these trifling attacks, however I do not wish to speculate. I leave the sport of speculating to you, Sir. In closing, I would like to dispel your confusion with regards to your botchings none of which have been either ‘keenly observed’ or ‘true’, and furthermore congratulate you on making the biggest buffoon of yourself in the quickest time imaginable.
-
- 2007-08-24 @ 12:25:19
I hesitate to interrupt this debate, but I would just like to point out that according to official records, it is actually a Mr Trevithick Huffington-Warbles, deceased, who currently holds the title of 'biggest buffoon', after his capacious pantaloons fell round his ankles as he rose to make his maiden speech to the House of Commons on February 24, 1876.
-
- 2007-08-24 @ 12:25:23
I hesitate to interrupt this debate, but I would just like to point out that according to official records, it is actually a Mr Trevithick Huffington-Warbles, deceased, who currently holds the title of 'biggest buffoon', after his capacious pantaloons fell round his ankles as he rose to make his maiden speech to the House of Commons on February 24, 1876.
-
- http://
- 2007-08-24 @ 13:06:07
Res Ipsa Loquitor.
-
- 2007-08-21 @ 17:15:49
I read the Mangen extracts this morning, and began to wonder if all my life I had misunderstood the entire female gender.
-
- http://
- 2007-08-24 @ 14:13:44
Can I second the plaudit for "spumous mullock"?
It's one of those phrases where, in an Einsteinian way, you feel the whole fabric of language bending in response to it.
-
- 2007-08-27 @ 13:41:59
On behalf of Websters dictionary I'd like to caution Ms10 for flagrant misuse of flowery language and crudity under the act of 'Vague Rants and Pointless Defamation', 1910.
-
- http://www.flickr.com/photos/rithompson/
- 2007-08-28 @ 16:17:17
You shouldn't be wasting your breath ranting about her, she sounds very shallow!

When I was eight I didn't like girls and got upset whenever anyone accused me of liking girls. It was definitely uncool to hang around girls. And then suddenly a few years later without explanation I was supposed to be obsessed with girls and do anything (lie, cheat etc) to get to fourth base. This abrupt turnaround was most confusing and may explain a few things...
But returning to the point... I'm surprised the editor didn't say: 'Oi, Mangan, this is the same old bollocks I've been reading about dating for the last twenty years, I'm not printing this shite.'
The sooner people get over superstitious claptrap like the hypothetical existence of 'The One', the better we'll all be.